|
Straight
Track #68
| The Case Against Light Duty
Richard A.
Haydu
Hoey, Farina Attorney
1-888-425-1212
Railroads often times will want a railroader to
return to work on "light duty" after an on-the-job
injury. The railroads’ use of the term “light duty” implies
that the employee can return to work, as long as certain
restrictions are in place in regard to what the employee does in
the workplace.
|
|

|
In truth, there is no such thing as light duty when you
work for the railroad. The
main reason that the railroad allows an employee to return to a so-called
light duty assignment is to avoid having to report fully all employee
injury lost wage days to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA).
Under FRA rules, lost wage days from employee injuries have to be
reported by the railroad periodically and failure to do so subjects the
railroad to potential fines. By
having an employee work "light duty" the railroad can under
report lost wage days and make itself look good to the federal government.
Additionally, by returning to light duty, the railroad
tries to make the railroader feel indebted to the company while easily
keeping tabs on his medical condition.
Down the road, the railroad will be in position to hold over the
head of the injured railroader the implication that by returning to work
he wasn’t really that hurt in the first place. Time and again during
settlement negotiations as well as in court, I have heard the claim agent
say, “After all, he DID return to work.”
Jurors, too, have been known to associate working light duty with
"not being so injured" and returned lower awards based on that.
Since in reality there are no light duty jobs on the
railroad, light duty assignments run from the ridiculous to the downright
dangerous. On the ridiculous side, one railroader recently told us that
when he returned to work on light duty the railroad had him literally
counting paperclips in the yard office. On the dangerous side, another
railroader told us he returned with certain restrictions, which gradually
eroded to where he was swinging a sledgehammer and greatly increasing the
risk of re-injury. The dangerous side is more typical.
As we've stated in previous Straight Track
editions (see ST#23),
it's important that you provide your doctors with a copy of your job
description so they can accurately decide what work duties – if any –
you are capable of performing. If
your doctor says you cannot work your regular job, he decided this for a
good reason. Your supervisors
are not doctors. They can
easily and subtly change working conditions to your detriment.
In one case, the railroad was so bold it had the injured railroader
move filing cabinets around the yard office!
The man re-injured his shoulder and the railroad blamed him for not
making his supervisor stick to his doctor's restrictions.
Bottom Line
The railroad is not doing you or any other injured
railroaders any favors by offering "light duty".
The railroad’s use of light duty is nothing more than a grave
injustice to all railroaders. By covering up the reality of the safety
track record on their lines and under reporting it from the government,
dangerous practices and defective equipment are not being properly
investigated. The FRA is not given a true picture of a railroad's safety.
By avoiding light duty, railroaders can protect the
future security of themselves and their families, and take an affirmative
step toward increasing the safety level for their fellow – and future -
union brothers.
If
you are ever in the position where you have to consider whether or not to
accept a light duty assignment, first weigh all the issues carefully -
health, safety, monies, etc., and speak with us, your union designated
legal counsel, for free legal advice.
If you return to work on light duty, remember to keep it light duty
and limit your work according to your doctor’s restrictions.
[top]
|